Arc Forumnew | comments | leaders | submitlogin
10 points by KirinDave 6090 days ago | link | parent

The thing is, tech wise Common Lisp is in very good shape. It could very much take C++'s place and everyone would be happier and probably get similar performance with cleaner code.

Likewise, Scsh shows that a lisp-1 could encroach on territory typically occupied by Ruby and Perl.

These aren't Lisp's problems. Lisp's problems are social. It has no anchor point, and most of the modern, successful languages have an anchor point either in a tightly knit community, a corporate backer, or a charismatic personality. pg could assume this roll, but thus far he hasn't opened up the arc development enough to really allow that to happen. Given his duties at Y-combinator, I guess this is understandable, but it's not helping Arc at all.



2 points by skenney26 6089 days ago | link

Arc seems pretty open to me. There's nothing stopping people from creating countless useful libraries. I'm guessing that many people have turned away from Arc after seeing the dirth of libraries. Paradoxically, that's one of the things that attracts me to Arc. There are many opportunities to make an early impact within the Arc community.

-----

2 points by KirinDave 6088 days ago | link

All of the work in anarki could be invalidated by the next pg arc release. Since pg is the font of arc, there is nothing anyone could say about it.

The community forks arc, but they aren't included.

-----