Arc Forumnew | comments | leaders | submitlogin
1 point by bootload 6170 days ago | link | parent

"... Or maybe a title and description is enough. ..."

As little as possible. Filling in fields is a pain. I think the description field could be optional if the code is commented. The bit I think would boost the understanding of the language is concrete examples. The pattern of reading the source code, writing a bit of code, posting it to arclanguage works for people who read the post.

Snippets scale better which is what you want. Quick failure with bad ideas. Good ideas expressed in code will then have to stand the test of time.